Tutorial · Explorers

Explorer 2.0 and chainz, Side by Side

Two public explorers show the Divi chain. They agree on the blocks and disagree on some balances, and each does things the other cannot. Here is what each one shows, where they differ, and which to open for which question.

About 10 minutes · Checked 2026-10-21

1Who runs what

Explorer 2.0chainz
Addressservices.divi.domains/explorer2/chainz.cryptoid.info/divi/
Run byDivi Services, on its own Divi nodesCryptoID, a third party that indexes hundreds of coins
NetworksMainnet, and testnet at /testnet/explorer2/Mainnet only
Calls the coinDivi"Divicoin", the coin's older name
CostsFree, no ads, no keyFree, ad-supported; the API is limited to one call every 10 seconds unless you have a key

Neither one is the chain. Both read the same blocks from a Divi node and present them. That is why the next section is short.

2What they agree on

Block heights, block hashes, transaction ids, amounts and timestamps are facts of the chain, and both sites show them the same. Block 4,263,840 has hash 33bee78b… and two transactions on both. If they ever disagree on a block, one of them is behind or has briefly followed a losing fork; wait a few minutes and reload.

They present the same facts differently. Explorer 2.0 shows a block's size as 0.92 KB where chainz says 0.9 kB; Explorer 2.0 gives the time in your local zone where chainz gives UTC. Same block.

3Why a balance can differ

Balances are not written in the chain; each explorer adds them up itself, and the two use different rules. The important case is staking vaults. Coins in a vault sit on a special two-key script, one key for the staking node and one for the owner. Explorer 2.0 asks the node for both the ordinary coins and the vault coins of an address and shows them as separate cards (Balance, Vault Balance, Total Balance). chainz does not know about vault scripts, so it attributes those coins to neither key.

A real example

The owner address of one large vault shows a Vault Balance of about 3.5 million DIVI on Explorer 2.0 and a Balance of 0 on chainz, with no transactions at all. Neither site is lying: chainz is answering "coins on a plain address" and Explorer 2.0 is answering "coins this owner controls". For any address that stakes through a vault, trust Explorer 2.0's figure.

Two smaller differences. chainz's own documentation says an address balance "can be delayed by up to 6 hours" on its API without a key, while Explorer 2.0 asks a node at the moment you load the page. And on the chainz block page, the lottery pot and reward are shown as coins "Created" by the block, so a lottery block reads "Created 504,415 DIVI", whereas Explorer 2.0 shows only the transaction outputs and lets you add them up. The two statements describe the same coins.

4Only on Explorer 2.0

5Only on chainz

6Which to open

You want toOpen
Check whether a payment arrivedEither. Both show the transaction within a minute.
Read a staking wallet's balance or rewardsExplorer 2.0. chainz cannot see vault coins.
Download your history for taxesExplorer 2.0, CSV button.
See the largest holderschainz Rich List (minus vaults).
Verify something independently of Divichainz.
Try things with coins that are not realExplorer 2.0 on testnet.
Follow a link from a 2019 forum postIt will be chainz; the same block or transaction is on Explorer 2.0 by pasting the hash into search.
Pull numbers into a scriptExplorer 2.0's RPC service for anything; chainz's API for a single balance or the block count.

7The third one: the classic explorer

Divi Services also still runs the older explorer at /explorer/, built on the open-source eIquidus software. It has its own rich list, a masternode list, a "movement" page of large transactions, and a network page, and its block pages take a hash rather than a height. Unlike chainz, it does count vault coins toward the owner: for the large vault owner in section 3 it gives about 3.52 million DIVI, the same as Explorer 2.0, though as one plain balance rather than separate vault cards. It stays up because old links point at it; for anything new, start with Explorer 2.0.

If something goes wrong

You seeWhat it means
chainz shows 0 for an address you know has coinsThe coins are in a staking vault. Open the address on Explorer 2.0 and read Vault Balance.
chainz has no testnetCorrect; its testnet address redirects away. Use /testnet/explorer2/.
chainz API returns nothing or an error pageWait 10 seconds between calls; it refuses faster ones.
Different confirmation countsOne site's node is a block or two behind. Both climb by one a minute; the difference is not a problem.
An address looks different on the two sitesA vault output: Explorer 2.0 shows both keys, chainz shows the script a different way. The transaction id is the same.

Still stuck? Ask the Divi chatbot, or see all tutorials.